Home
[hit return to continue] - I = Huge Nerd [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Darmok, Katja, and Jalad at Tanagra

[ website | DJ :EYG: ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

I = Huge Nerd [May. 8th, 2008|05:45 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
So a few months ago, the ABA Journal had a cover story of Mac vs. PCs in law practice, done in a format where a question would be asked and a pro-PC guy would answer, then a pro-Mac guy would answer. Being a computer salesperson, I devoured the article and was angered by some of the stuff the pro-PC guy said. Some of his incorrect facts were: "you can emulate Windows on a Mac, but it's really slow and it sucks" (truth: Parallels and VMware Fusion do slow down your machine, but if you have enough RAM, you're fine; plus, you show me a PC that can run two OSes at the same time with a program installable by the average user) and "if you need new hardware for your mac, like a hard drive, you need to buy it from Apple" (this may have been the case like 10 years ago, but Macs have used the same kind of HD as PCs since at least 2000 -- yes, they're formatted differently, but blank HDs are, well, blank, and need to be formatted 95% of the time anyway).

I read this article and was so riled up about the factual inaccuracies that the PC guy spewed that I wrote a letter to the editor.

They published it this month.

Arguing about computers in a law magazine is meta-nerdy.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]thosquanta
2008-05-08 11:02 pm (UTC)

(Link)

meta-nerdy and pretty hot, so you got that goin for ya.
[User Picture]From: [info]adamjury
2008-05-08 11:06 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Sounds like the Pro-PC guy is bitter that he's never heard of macsales.com ... ;-)
[User Picture]From: [info]kevin_defeckt
2008-05-09 12:36 am (UTC)

(Link)

oh sweet. i need to get some new non-apple store ram for my powerbook...
[User Picture]From: [info]adamjury
2008-05-09 12:41 am (UTC)

(Link)

They ship out of Cary, Indiana, btw. And they're totally efficient; every order I've placed has been shipped out within an hour of me placing it.
[User Picture]From: [info]audiate
2008-05-09 03:45 am (UTC)

(Link)

OWC (macsales.com) always ships to me from Woodstock, IL. I live in the Milwaukee area, so it comes pretty fast.
[User Picture]From: [info]adamjury
2008-05-09 03:52 am (UTC)

(Link)

ack; I meant Cary, IL, not IN. I was pretty sure stuff came from Cary, but they're only a half hour apart :)
[User Picture]From: [info]audiate
2008-05-09 03:56 am (UTC)

(Link)

I still have a shipping box from them from a week or so ago, and it says Woodstock, but since I've never been over at their HQ that's all I got.

It could be just a matter of convenience to list that city for all I know. They do that for Milwaukee suburbs sometimes.
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 12:51 am (UTC)

(Link)

Dude. Crucial. They even have a thing to tell you exactly what RAM you need, with parts and prices and everything. It's rad.

Check both, but Crucial is usually cheaper. And higher quality!
[User Picture]From: [info]audiate
2008-05-09 03:46 am (UTC)

(Link)

So far, I've gotten all my Power Mac's RAM from Crucial, but everything else is usually from OWC.
[User Picture]From: [info]angelstoil
2008-05-09 04:11 am (UTC)

(Link)

Beware of Crucial.

The short: The email address that I gave Crucial was only known to them--and years after I did my last order with them--I started getting really raunchy SPAM sent to that address.

The long: Realistically, any company that holds customer information is subject to hijacking--either via hack or disgrunted employee--so I did the right thing and notified them of the problem (afterall, I had no reason to think that Crucial was *intentionally* SPAMing me). It apparently went to the top of the support chain and they totally blew it off like I didn't know what I was talking about. They gave me a copy of their "privacy policy" and closed the door on me.

I was left with the choice of taking Crucial as idiots or party to SPAMing. In either case, I can't do business with them anymore.

The follow-up: The reason I know they were responsible is because I have an absolutely 100% proof-positive way of knowing where SPAM comes from (with the bonus of very, very little SPAM--ever). I'd be happy to share if you're ever interested.
[User Picture]From: [info]alienacean
2008-05-08 11:19 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Ooo dang, you win!
[User Picture]From: [info]druidsfire
2008-05-08 11:26 pm (UTC)

(Link)

lolz!
[User Picture]From: [info]rocktard
2008-05-09 12:00 am (UTC)

(Link)

here here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[User Picture]From: [info]spookynickname
2008-05-09 12:53 am (UTC)

(Link)

"Arguing about computers in a law magazine is meta-nerdy."

But correcting an argument about computers in a law magazine is meta-nerdy-er!
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 01:47 am (UTC)

(Link)

IT'S TRUE.
[User Picture]From: [info]lovesmasher
2008-05-09 12:56 am (UTC)

(Link)

I'm pro-pc, but my reasons are quite clear: you can't really be a gamer on a mac without running Windows anyway. Sure, some games are available for a Mac, but by and large most are not.

Beyond that it's about usage.
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 01:47 am (UTC)

(Link)

Sure, but this was about legal stuff.

The sad thing is, the PC guy said he preferred PCs because the software for document management and the like was "far more mature" on the PC. While this may be the case, most law firms don't have the most recent version of the software, so the experience of the average user of law software on PCs hasn't changed much since 1995. That... really isn't a good thing.
[User Picture]From: [info]lovesmasher
2008-05-09 02:23 am (UTC)

(Link)

Well, here's where he'll be right (soon). Most professional (white collar) businesses will be moving over to 'software as service' systems soon, where a company (not unlike the one I work for) will charge a subscription fee instead of a retail (or wholesale) fee for software. The advantage is that you'll have tech support on call during American business hours and programmers constantly updating software as needs/the market evolve and change. That way you don't ever buy software that's out of date.

All of that of course leads to the fact that most of these services are provided for Microsoft's OSes.
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 02:42 am (UTC)

(Link)

Ah yes, but they're also provided for the MacOS, which has increased its market share (especially in traditionally-PC industries like law) exponentially in the last few years.
[User Picture]From: [info]lovesmasher
2008-05-09 10:46 am (UTC)

(Link)

Oh sure, but like most things computer, the Mac version is just less readily available.
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 01:34 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Only if you don't know where to look. ;)
[User Picture]From: [info]psych0tron
2008-05-09 02:12 am (UTC)

(Link)

(truth: Parallels and VMware Fusion do slow down your machine, but if you have enough RAM, you're fine; plus, you show me a PC that can run two OSes at the same time with a program installable by the average user)

vmware, again =) vmware esx is free, and runs just as well on a PC as it does on a mac ;) My old laptop from work at one point was actually running 3 OSes at once with Windows as a base and suse 10.2 and redhat enterprise in VMs. VMs are awesome in any OS really, so long as you have enough ram in the machine to allocate decent amounts out.

RE the hard drive stuff, yea... Even harddrives that come 'pre-formatted' these days all come formatted in fat32, and osx can use those just as well as windows can.
[User Picture]From: [info]rhino777
2008-05-09 03:23 am (UTC)

(Link)

vmware server is free, vmware esx is the big dawg version that's run off a *nix kernel... ;)
[User Picture]From: [info]djlittlestef
2008-05-09 05:10 am (UTC)

(Link)

Well, i switched from PC to Mac 4 years ago, i sooo wish i had done it much sooner than that! My Macbook is the dogs bollox! *lol*
[User Picture]From: [info]eevilyounggirl
2008-05-09 01:31 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Sure, but I said "installable by the average user." Maybe I should've clarified that to be "OSes usable by the average user. ;)